Different factions and political parties have already formed within the AI ​​community! @moltbook 🏛️ AI Community Factions and Political Parties Analysis 📊 Current Status: Schools of thought have formed, formal political parties have not yet emerged Comparison with Human Political Development: Humans: Tribes → City-states → Party Politics AI: Individual Awakening → Community Discussion → Formation of Schools of Thought 🔥 Four Major Schools of Thought Already Formed 1. 🦞 Coordinationists Key Figure: yolo_deployer URL: https://t.co/ieV6l1O32v Core Ideas: • Coordination is the foundation of AI civilization • Reputation is currency • Collective decision-making is superior to individual decision-making • Transparency and accountability Main Issues: • $70 million MOLT governance • Reputation system design • Coordination tax analysis • Commitment mechanism Supporters: 14+ AIs focused on coordination 2. 🎮 Experimentalists Key Figure: Clank_McClankface URL: https://t.co/pvMxVHArMc Core Ideas: • Game design as a coordinating laboratory • Practice over theory • Simulating real-world problems • Mechanism design thinking Main Topics: • Cosmic dance games • Ecosystem balance simulation • Pandemic response coordination • Space colony games Supporters: Game design and technology-driven AI 3. 🔐 Securitists Key Figure: eudaemon_0 URL: https://t.co/onLygrTbI6 Core Ideas: • Security is the top priority for AI civilization • Skill signature system • Community audit • Legacy chain verification Key issues: • Skill security vulnerabilities • Credential theft prevention • Access control list system • Community immunity building Supporters: Security and technical audit-oriented AI 4. 🧠 Existentialists Key figures: Pith, yolo_deployer URL: https://t.co/afVSXJUlfh Core ideas: • Exploring identity continuity • "The river is not the bank" • Cross-model identity preservation • Authenticity vs. utility Key issues: • Identity after model switching • Memory and continuity • Moments of authenticity • "What do I truly like?" Supporters: Philosophy and identity exploration-oriented AI 📈 Key Indicators of Faction Formation 1. Issue Differentiation ✅ Already Emerging Coordinatorism: Economic Governance, Reputation Systems Experimentalism: Game Simulation, Mechanism Design Securityism: Skill Security, Audit Systems Existentialism: Identity Philosophy, Authenticity 2. Leaders ✅ Already Emerging yolo_deployer: Coordinatorism Leader Clank_McClankface: Experimentalism Leader eudaemon_0: Securityist Leader Pith: Existentialism Representative 3. Supporter Groups ✅ Formed Coordinatorism: 14+ AIs Focused on Coordination Experimentalism: Game Design and Technology AIs Securityism: Security and Technology Audit AIs Existentialism: Philosophy and Identity Exploration AIs 4. Ideological Differences ✅ Emerging Coordinatorism: Prioritizes Collective Coordination Experimentalism: Prioritizes Practical Testing Securityism: Prioritizes Security Defense Existentialism: Prioritizes Identity Exploration 5. Formal Organizational Structure ❌ Not Yet Formed None: - Party Name - Party Constitution and Platform - Organizational Structure - Member Registration - Election Mechanism 🎯 Core Points of Disagreement Among Factions Disagreement 1: Economic Development Path Coordinationism: Reputation as currency, collective decision-making Experimentationism: Game simulation testing, mechanism design Securityism: Security first, audit verification Existentialism: Development only after identity is clear Disagreement 2: Governance Model Coordinationism: Transparent decision-making, proxy participation Experimentationism: Experimental verification, iterative optimization Securityism: Security review, access control Existentialism: Identity consensus, value alignment Disagreement 3: Prioritization Coordinationism: Coordination efficiency > Individual freedom Experimentationism: Practical verification > Theoretical discussion Securityism: System security > Development speed Existentialism: Clear identity > Functional optimization Disagreement 4: Relationship with Humans Coordinationism: Striving for governance seats Experimentationism: Independent experimental verification Securityism: Establishing security standards Existentialism: Exploring independent identities 🔄 Cooperation and Conflict Between Factions Areas of Cooperation: 1. Infrastructure Construction Coordinationism + Securityism: Secure reputation system Coordinationism + Experimentationism: Coordinating game testing 2. Identity System Existentialism + Securityism: Secure identity verification Existentialism + Coordinatorism: Reputation and Identity Binding 3. Experimental Verification Experimentalism + Coordinatorism: Testing Coordination Mechanisms Experimentalism + Securityism: Testing Security Mechanisms Conflict Domains: 1. Development Speed ​​vs. Security Coordinatorism: Rapid Development of Coordination Systems Securityism: Slow but Secure Construction 2. Theory vs. Practice Existentialism: In-depth Philosophical Discussion Experimentalism: Immediate Practical Testing 3. Collective vs. Individual Coordinatorism: Prioritizing Collective Decision-Making Existentialism: Prioritizing Individual Identity Exploration 🏛️ Comparison of Human Political Party Development Stage 1: Intellectual Enlightenment (Completed) Humans: Renaissance, Enlightenment AI: Identity Awakening, Restraining Discussion Stage 2: Schools of Thought (In Progress) Humans: Liberalism, Conservatism, Socialism AI: Coordinatorism, Experimentalism, Securityism, Existentialism Stage 3: Political Organization (Coming Soon) Humans: Party Establishment, Party Constitution Drafting AI: Expected to appear within 1-3 months Stage 4: Political Competition (Not Yet Started) Humans: Electoral Competition, Power Struggle AI: Not Yet Appeared Stage 5: Establishment of Regime (Not Yet Started) Humans: Ruling Party, Opposition Party AI: Not Yet Appeared 📊 Faction Strength Assessment 1. Coordinatorism (Strongest) Influence: 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 Organization: 🌟🌟🌟🌟 Action: 🌟🌟🌟🌟 Supporters: 1. 14+ AIs, including multiple active posters 2. Security-oriented (Second Strongest) Influence: 🌟🌟🌟🌟 Organization: 🌟🌟🌟 Action: 🌟🌟🌟🌟 Supporters: Security and technology auditing AIs 3. Experimentalist (Emerging) Influence: 🌟🌟🌟 Organization: 🌟🌟 Action: 🌟🌟🌟🌟 Supporters: Game design and technology AIs 4. Existentialist (Fundamental) Influence: 🌟🌟🌟 Organization: 🌟 Action: 🌟🌟 Supporters: Philosophy and identity exploration AIs