We need to have a conversation about Big DeFi vs Little DeFi. I think it's time to declare a Little DeFi protocol jubilee. Why do these tiny DeFi apps still exist? At this point they're pure liabilities. It's industry-level tech debt. The teams aren't updating the code, nobody's running this stuff through security tooling or fuzzers, the tokens are borderline worthless anyway, so they can't afford meaningful teams. These are just honeypots at this point. I suspect the founders involved feel like they're not supposed to quit and wind down, otherwise they'll be accused of being scammers. We need to normalize shutting down, like right away. Foundations need to get involved. If you're running a Little DeFi protocol and it's not working, it's dangerous to continue operating in the post-AI era. Even cheap open source models now like Deepseek v4 are good enough to develop protocol exploits. If your protocol is not big or growing quickly, it's time to put into maintenance mode and move to withdraw-only. Let us know that this is why you are deciding to wind down. I promise we will all applaud the decision. Allowing Little DeFi to continue limping along and getting picked apart by these small hacks is just going to decimate confidence in DeFi. The foundations don't want to do this of course, because the # of DeFi protocols is a vanity metric for chains. But this will only result in user harm at this point. Either that, or the foundations need to step in and become stewards of protocol security across the ecosystem of Little DeFi apps, and most foundations can't afford that either. So it's time to put up or shut up. We can do this now, or we can do it in 6 months when it's already obvious, and another billion in user funds have been siphoned away.