#Crypto
Pendle 把 YT 抽成从 5% 提高到 7% 这件事，属于项目方的自由。
但有一个核心疑问：对现有的 YT token 是否生效。
如果影响的话 —— 相当于你买了定期理财，还没到期，对方说服务费要再提高 2% ，这显然属于单方面毁约。
如果不影响存量 YT —— 那就是双方互相选择，嫌贵就别用。
目前已经询问了项目方，还没有得到明确答复。
#Crypto
It's within Pendle's discretion to raise the YT fee from 5% to 7%.
However, there's a core question: does this apply to existing YT tokens?
If it does, it's like buying a fixed-term financial product, and before it matures, the other party says they're raising the service fee by another 2%. That's clearly a unilateral breach of contract.
If it doesn't affect existing YT, then it's a mutual choice—if you think it's too expensive, just don't use it.
We've already asked the project team but haven't received a clear answer yet.
@maiff20 我就直说了啊：
你竟然还在幻想 —— 任何公司 可以给你 任何帮助😂
@Blankwonder 7 天无理由的前提是不影响二次销售，这个界限是模糊的，但以京东为首的电商公司实际情况说。
我认为 不道德，鼓励，鼓励。